Todd's Blog

Back in 2003, I proposed that genomes were designed to be modular and mutable and that this was the probable explanation for the rapid species diversification immediately after the Flood. I also suggested that these genomic changes were the direct result of environmental stress. Barbara McClintock thought something similar about speciation and genomes. She called the genome a "highly sensitive organ" that can respond to new conditions by rearranging itself. In 2003, I had a few examples of eukaryotic retrotransposons that mobilized during periods of stress, but I knew of no examples of any rearrangements that could be linked to a useful phenotype. The best examples of genomic modularity that I could give at the time were genomic islands. These are regions of bacterial genomes that are identifiable by a GC content or codon preference different from the rest of the chromosome where the island is found. They are often bounded by repeat sequences, and most importantly, they conta

I guess I've been on a biography kick lately. I didn't even notice it until I sat down to write this, and I realized that recent posts have focused on Haeckel ( Richards's new bio ) and Darwin ( the latest issue of Answers mag ). Now I'm going to write about Darwin again, but I'll try to make my comments short and worth your time. Well... at least worth your time. I picked up both of Janet Browne's biographies of Darwin, Charles Darwin: Voyaging (1995) and Charles Darwin: The Power of Place (2002), when I visited Down House on a miserably cold and rainy day last March. Some years ago, I read Desmond and Moore's Darwin: The Life of a Tormented Evolutionist , which I really enjoyed. Browne's two massive tomes were a nice expansion of the story I already knew. Not surprisingly given the size of the books, Browne moves along at a leisurely pace, taking many opportunities to stop and appreciate the scenery. She includes sections on the Shrewsbury School th

John Wilkins (1614-1672) is not the most famous name of the Enlightenment, but he made important contributions to the history of science and religion. He was a latitudinarian English clergyman during the tumult of the mid-seventeenth century England. He was also the first author to write an English language defense of Galileo in 1638 and 1640, in which he championed Galileo's doctrine of accommodation. He later helped found the Royal Society, of which he served as one of the first secretaries. According to the doctrine of accommodation, God had to accommodate human ignorance when giving the Bible in order to clearly communicate salvation to all people. As a result, the Bible contains figurative and nonliteral language and cannot be used as a source of information in scientific debate. Galileo used the idea to argue against his opponents who claimed that the Bible taught a geocentric universe. In England, Wilkins's enthusiasm for the doctrine fit well with the growing popularit

Whenever I'm working on a project, my desk spontaneously grows piles of stuff, mostly books I'm reading, articles I should read, and journals I don't have time to read. When each project is finished, it's time to clean off the desk and get ready for the next one. Last Friday, I finished up four big projects (which you'll hear about later), and what followed was a serious desk cleaning. Cleaning the desk is always interesting, because you never know what you might find. It's like a little archaeological expedition. Who knows? The Ark of the Covenant could very well be lost somewhere on my desk. On Friday, underneath the piles of stuff, I found an old issue of Nature (from May 1, 2008) with a post-it marking one of the pages. I flipped it open to see what caught my attention eight months ago, and I found the article Mapping and sequencing of structural variation from eight human genomes by Kidd et al. Oh yeah, I can see why I marked it. It's a fascinating pa

One of my articles in the next Answers mag was posted at the AIG website: Natural Selection—Theory or Reality? I also want to take this opportunity to rave about the Grants' new book, How and Why Species Multiply . If you want to understand natural selection using some of the best research on the topic, don't just sit there reading my blog. Get their book. I'll be back tomorrow with a post on human genome variability.

So... It's cold in Michigan: Christmas the way it was meant to be experienced. What's better than waking up to nine degrees? So far, that's been the high for the day! This afternoon, there's going to be a windchill warning. This is the coldest Christmas in quite some time. The funny thing is that it was 68 on Friday in Dayton. Can't have Christmas like that. In other news, I read this passage this morning in I Peter 2:13-17 ( HCSB ): Submit to every human institution because of the Lord, whether to the Emporer as the supreme authority, or to the governors as those sent out by him to punish those who do evil and to praise those who do good. For it is God's will that you, by doing good, silence the ignorance of foolish people. As God's slaves, live as free people, but don't use your freedom as a way to conceal evil. Honor everyone. Love the brotherhood. Fear God. Honor the Emperor. Lots of applications come to mind, but I'll limit my comments to thi

I think this might be completely wacko, but I'll post it anyway. Read at your own risk. I've argued before that mutations are nonrandom and that genomes are designed to be mutated and reorganized as part of the emergence of new species within baramins. I've also argued that most muations are not harmful but rather neutral. The latest Molecular Biology and Evolution has an intriguing article by Domazet-Lošo and Tautz that looks at mutations associated with genetic diseases. Here's the abstract: An ancient evolutionary origin of genes associated with human genetic diseases Several thousand genes in the human genome have been linked to a heritable genetic disease. The majority of these appear to be nonessential genes (i.e., are not embryonically lethal when inactivated), and one could therefore speculate that they are late additions in the evolutionary lineage toward humans. Contrary to this expectation, we find that they are in fact significantly overrepresented amon

As I pondered starting this blog, I needed to make sure that I actually had enough to post about. I'm not really a talkative guy. One idea I had was highlighting items from the CORE library. Our original library was accumulated over a lifetime of collecting by Kurt Wise. Tragically, nearly all of that library was lost in a fire that destroyed the Bryan College administration building in February of 2000. Since then, we've been rebuilding the collection a little at a time, with occasional help from foundations and donors. Since becoming CORE director, I've tried to make library development a priority, and we've added significant items to our collection. This seems like a perfect forum to share some of them. The library currently consists of over 3000 items, mostly books and a substantial collection of periodicals. The books cover 400 years of publication (our earliest book is a Jesuit commentary on Genesis published in 1608). We have a large selection of Bible a

In case you missed it, the call for abstracts for the 2009 joint BSG/geology meeting has been posted at the BSG website. This year's conference will be held at the end of July at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Kentucky. The abstract deadline is April 4, 2009. Our plans are still tentative, but we intend to devote a whole day each to geology, biology, and the papers from Genesis Kinds: Creationism and the Origin of Species . Registration for the summer conference in Kentucky will be available after the England conference. There's also still room available at the February Genesis Kinds conference in England. You can register online or by post .

Coming up from Answers magazine in January, 2009 is their theme issue on Charles Darwin. You're probably thinking that you've read everything you could possibly read on Darwin from a creationist perspective. I sympathize with that. Creationists tend to be a broken record when it comes to hammering home the creationist message about Darwin. I think you'll find this issue a little different. I contributed a very little reviewing and writing for this issue, and I've seen some of the articles. I guarantee, they're not what you would expect. A few of the articles have already been posted at the Answers website as a sneak preview, and you can judge for yourself. "The Pursuit of Darwin" by my CORE colleague Roger Sanders is a kind of spiritual biography of Darwin. The companion piece to Roger's article is called "Darwin's Personal Struggle with Evil" and tells the sad tale of Annie, Darwin's beloved daughter. Paul Garner's &

I just finished up Robert Richards's new A Tragic Sense of Life: Ernst Haeckel and the Struggle over Evolutionary Thought . As with Richards's other books, this was well worth the time invested. When I started the book, I knew next to nothing about Haeckel. I knew he was the primary popularizer of Darwin in Germany, merging evolution with the strong morphological tradition of his native country. I knew a little bit about monism, primarily by reading the works of his Jesuit opponent, Erich Wasmann. I also knew that creationists portray him as a proto-Nazi and a fraud. Check out the titles of some of the creationist articles published about him over the years: "Haeckel: Legacy of Fraud to Popularise Evolution" "Graphic Fraud" "Influential Darwinists Supported the Nazi Holocaust" "Ernst Haeckel: Evangelist for evolution and apostle of deceit" "Haeckel: the legacy of a lie" Subtle they're not, but they're also not alo

In case you didn't know, this year is the twentieth anniversary of the Center for Origins Research. Yeah, I know there's another anniversary this year, but that one's not nearly so important. We created an anniversary website where you can find out more about CORE and some of the events we have planned for our anniversary. Of special interest is the conference we're planning for February 4-5, 2009 at the High Leigh Conference Center in Hoddesdon, England. It's called "Genesis Kinds: Creationism and the Origin of Species" (it was originally inspired by that other anniversary), and it will feature speakers from Bryan College, the Master's College, Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, and Biblical Creation Ministries. Online registration is available, or you can register by post . We'll be doing the same conference in the US at the end of July, in case you can't afford that plane ticket across the pond. But if you're in the neighbo

You know those creationist books that try to explain variation in human skin color by appealing to mendelian genetics? They give the impression that God created Adam and Eve with all the alleles for human skin color, and by mendelian sorting we get the modern races. You know what books I'm talking about. Just about every major creationist organization has used human skin tone to illustrate mendelian genetics in one publication or another. A recent review article by Jean Lightner addresses this idea directly, and I thought I would highlight it here, since its impenetrable title (" Genetics of Coat Color I: The Melanocortin 1 Receptor (MC1R) ") is likely to put off those who might most benefit from reading it. Jean examined the literature on coat and skin color and found that there are far more alleles than could possibly be explained by direct creation (unless God has continued to intervene and create new color alleles). The MC1R gene codes for a G-protein coupled rec

Here we go: my first newsy post! CORE just recently released the third volume in the CORE Issues in Creation monograph series, titled "Animal and Plant Baramins," written by yours truly. It's a new study of more than three dozen new baramins, colloquially known as "created kinds." Why is this interesting? It significantly expands the number of identified holobaramins. It's the first large-scale application of statistical baraminology. And the overall results are starting (just starting) to look very interesting. Read the abstract or get it from the publisher Wipf and Stock for $23.20 . P.S. We've got two more volumes of CORE Issues almost ready to go to the publisher, and another one in production. Busy, busy, busy!

I must be crazy. Just the other day, I was telling someone how much I value my anonymity, and here I am starting a blog. Frankly, I never thought much of blogging. After all, it's totally free, anyone can do it, and there's no control whatsoever. It just seemed like a big waste of time. The past few months, though, I've been observing a few blogs, and I've come to see that I may have been hasty in my judgment. Yes, some blogs are nothing more than opinionated (sometimes bigoted) outlets for people to spew their irrationality onto the internet. But some blogs aren't always bad, and there is some utility in them, the most obvious of which is keeping up with obscure news. That's what inspired me to start this blog. (Imagine that: blog hater to blogger in under a year. What's the world coming to?) My objective here is to create a convenient way to keep people updated about what I'm doing in the area of creationism. This is not a creation vs. evolut